24
Jan 12

Non-Jews, Torah, Noahide laws, teshuvah

According to Torah all of mankind is required to keep the many hundred commandments.
[Documentation: http://www.sevenlawsofnoah.com/seven-laws-of-a-noah-a-consistent-creator-requires-mankind-to-keep-all-of-his-revealed-laws/]

In fact, any geir [non-Jewish Torah-observant proselyte; see e.g. Exodus 12:48-49] who transgresses the shabbat is kareit [cut off] from the covenant with haSheim;
until he/she makes teshuvah and starts keeping the commandments of Torah non-selectively again. Non-Jews whom don’t keep the Torah [look up גוים or זרים /זר in a concordance] are not included in the covenant with haSheim according to Torah.

To Christians:
It is not possible to become included in the covenant with haSheim by the way specified in the NT.
NT is contradicting the Torah. Documentation: http://www.netzarim.co.il/Shared/Xn-Misojudaized%20Scriptures.htm

Learn more here:Will of the Creator : Logical reasons – based on scientific premises – for the existence of a Super intelligent and Orderly Creator and that He hasn’t left His sapient creatures without an Instruction Manual – Torah ['books of Moses'] – to ascertain, and aspire to, His purpose.

Share

19
Jan 12

Yusef Mikhael Eliyah, Noahide laws, rabbis, Facebook, Torah, Judaism, Seven laws of Noah

This is my post on Yusef Mikhael Eliyah’s video:

Those rabbis whom don’t want to see people become Jews, truly contradict the most ancient and logical Halakhah (see the word משפט – ‘mishpat’ – Deuternomy 17:8-13, et.al; which are about ‘mishpatim’ — i.e. decisions with a logical connection to written Torah; not an approval of Rabbis allowing destroying ones beard with a scissor, which Torah explicitly prohibits).
Tana”kh does not give any rabbi or any other Jew or non-Jew authority to teach to any individual that he/she is exempt of keeping any mitzwah of Torah- Deuteronomy 13:1-6. A mitzwah is only for a certain group of people if Torah explicitly specifies this.

If Torah doesn’t specify a difference between Jews and geirim – non-Jewish Torah-observant proselyetes in the process of becoming Jews – it is illogical to assume any difference; since Torah explicitly state that there is one Torah for the geir and for the Jew — Exodus 12:48-49, Deuteronomy 29f, et.al.

‘Speak to benei Yisraeil’ has always included geirim; and that used phrase does not logically imply that goyim – non-Jews whom don’t keep Torah – are exempted.
According to Deuteronomy 29:17-20 and a multitude of other verses of Tana”kh, haSheim does not forgive people whom are not doing their utmost to observe the many hundred mitzwot of Torah to the best of their ability [Documentation: http://www.jewishsalvation.com/atonement/deuteronomy-2917-20-hashem-wont-acquiesce-to-forgive-him-follow-own-heart-and-eyes/]

The most ancient and logical Halakhah is that the Noakhide laws was only the initial requirements in order to become a geir toshav, which according to a multitude of verses in Torah is required to keep Torah as the Jew does. It has never been an acceptable end-goal. The notion that ‘Seven laws of Noah’ is an acceptable end-goal was erronously integrated in Jewish teachings due to Christian persecutions. Further extensive documentation of all of this is available in the book ‘Atonement in the Biblical new Covenant’ [Available at. http://www.netzarim.co.il ; Israel Mall ].

[More documentation in this and other articles of this blog of mine: http://www.sevenlawsofnoah.com/jewish-noahides/torah-judaism-prosletyzing-deuteronomy-3112-gerim-jews-louis-feldman-winning-converts-noahides-conversion-judaism/ ]

Share

27
Oct 11

brit Noach, B’reshit 9:11, Noah, kipur, forgiveness, Genesis 9:11

The Bәrit Noakh

—9.11
והקמתי את-בריתי אתכם
ולא-יכרת כל-בשר עוד ממי המבול
ולא-יהיה עוד מבול לשחת הארץ

(wa-ha-qimoti et-bәriti itkhem,
wә-lo-yikareit kol-basar, od mi-mei ha-Ma•bul;
wә-lo-yiheyeh od, Ma•bul lә-shakheit ha-aretz;
And I will establish my bәrit with you, pl.
and all flesh/meat won’t be excised another [time] from the waters of the Ma•bul;
and there won’t be another [time], of a Ma•bul to destroy the land.)

Notice that the only promise is that there will be no recurrence of the Ma•bul. Clerics who represent that the bәrit Noakh provides ki•pur (atonement) distort and misrepresent the teachings of Tor•âh. Those who follow such clerics place their trust in the clerics instead of in י--ה and in Tor•âh.

Further details may be found in the chapter “The Bәnei Noakh” in Who Are the Nәtzâr•im? and Atonement In the Biblical ‘New Covenant’ Live-Link (ABNC Live-Link) in our Distance Learning Syllabus (see the appropriate Ministry).

Share

06
Aug 11

Noahide laws, Judaism, Christianity, Noahide Nations, mitzvot, historical Yeshua

This is a reply to person whom wrote a post at the Noahide Nations mailing list

Dear Jasmine!

My name is Anders and I would like to reply to your post on the Noahide Nations-list.
I am happy that you want to convert and become a Jewess. HaSheim wants all of mankind to observe His mitzwot (many more than the ‘seven laws of Noakh’), including becoming a Jew/Jewess. (Documented in this blog of mine: Link)


Regarding J.C.:
The historical person was named Ribi [a title] Y’hoshua and you can find more information about him here:
Christians created a counterfeit image of Ribi Y’hoshua called ‘Jesus’ and his teachings were heavily redacted to the “gospel of Matt.”..



A reconstruction of his teachings can be found on the above website.
I hope this info helps!


I wish you a great day!!


Regards,, Anders Branderud
Share

02
Jul 11

Holy Creator, perfect Torah for all of the world; mitzwot of Torah for all of mankind, not just Jews

My comment to this YouTube-video:

I also do care very much for all of the people of this world; and Torah is very clear on that all of mankind is obligated to observe the mitzwot. The Torah is also very clear on that the persons rejecting Torah don’t have a relationsship with HaSheim. Look up all Torah-verses about ‘goyim’, ‘zarim’ and ‘gerim’ to find out! HaSheim is holy and Perfect and thus can’t have a relationsship with a person not doing his/her utmost to keep Torah, which would cause Him to become imperfect.

Share

25
Jun 11

Ger toshav, benei-Noah, ha-olam haba, Talmud, Sanhedrin 56a, Mamonides Yad, Melakhim 8:10

“Some, even some Orthodox rabbis, argue that Benei-Noakh merit a place in hâ-olâm ha-. Today’s misnamed Benei-Noakh movement, which shouldn’t really be called Benei-Noakh, is the vanguard among the goyim that is headed in the right direction. Nevertheless, Talmud and the Sages, including Maimonides, agree that the phrase Benei-Noakh is properly defined as all goyim.2According to Talmud (Sanhedrin 56a) and the Encyclopedia Judaica, “Every non-Jew is a ‘son of the berit of Noakh‘ (see be-Reishit 9)”19 [emphasis added]. Thus, even Hitler is included amongBenei-Noakh. Clearly, Benei-Noakh aren’t the non-Jews to whom the Sages referred as meriting a place in hâ-olâm ha-. Nor did the Sages ever explicitly state “Benei-Noakh.” Rather, the Sages referred specifically and explicitly to geirim, not goyim! It is only modern rabbis, first under persecution by the Church and, more recently, pressure to be ‘politically correct’ and ‘anti-missionary’ who have obfuscated this point.

Talmud shows that the Benei-Noakh are goyim who, if guilty of blasphemy, are executed by the sword – rather than by stoning as the Jew (and geir) would be executed for the same offense (Sanhedrin 56a.). Thus, the Bën-Noakh is conspicuously distinguished from the geir. The Bën-Noakh is outside of Judaism and its Beritot, while the geir has been granted nilwëh status, by a Beit-Din, onto Beit-Yisrâ·eil, within the Beritot. While Geir Tzëdëq may here be reasonably inferred, in contrast to the Geir Toshâv, this advanced status is not explicitly specified. In Sanhedrin 56b we find that certain rabbis added interpretations of the basic Shëva Mitzwot Benei-Noakh, probably distinguishing Geir Tzëdëq above the provisional trainee Geir Toshâv. It bears noting here that the Shëva MitzwotBenei-Noakh were originated by the Beit Din ha-Netzârim and the earliest reference to the Shëva Mitzwot Benei-Noakh is found in Ma·avâr 15.29 (see Appendix IV – Ma·avâr 15 Text).

The assertion that Bën-Noakh refers only to the one who actually keeps the Shëva Mitzwot Benei-Noakh and, consequently, is the one receiving “salvation,” simply isn’t compatible with the sources. In the interest of promoting interfaith relations, both Christians and Jews earlier focused on a misreading of Maimonides which, in English, seems to, but cannot possibly, extend yeshuâh to gentiles based solely on observing the Shëva Mitzwot Benei-Noakh. Encouragingly,Orthodox leaders have recently become increasingly distant from this misreading. As the Encyclopedia Judaica notes:Maimonides equates the ‘Khâsid of the (gentile) nations’ who has a share in hâ-olâm ha- even though he has not become a Jew with the gentile who keeps the laws of Noakh (“Noachide Laws,” EJ, 12:1189). Yet, those who cite this often fail to also note Maimonides other declaration that “he who accepts its [the berit with Noakh] obligations is a Geir Toshâv“ (Masëkët Avodâh Zârâh 64b;Maimonides Yad, Melâkhim 8.10) – i.e., entailing recognition by a Beit-Din, not a Bën-Noakh / gentile, as the English inaccuracy seems to suggest!

Arguing that real Benei-Noakh are only the ones who keep the Shëva Mitzwot Benei-Noakh is tantamount to arguing that only the totally law-abiding portion of US citizens (and by their own, self-professed, reckoning if we follow the Benei-Noakh paradigm) are real US citizens. Most U.S. politicians and clergy probably wouldn’t make that cut, to say nothing of a sizeable segment of other acknowledged and legally certified U.S. citizens. To cite an old joke: The only legitimate Americans by that definition would be you and me – and I’m not at all sure about you. Even if Benei-Noakh could keep all of the Shëva Mitzwot Benei-Noakh as interpreted by the Batei-Din, all of their life, they still would become no more than Benei-Noakh – all of whom are defined in Talmud as goyim – and we’re back where we started – no Mabul, but no yeshuâh either! Keeping all of the Shëva Mitzwot Benei-Noakh defined nothing beyond a Bën-Noakh, and in no way implied participation of a member ofBenei-Noakh (= all goyim) in the berit between ha-Sheim and Beit-Yisrâ·eil and Israel’s corresponding portion (as contrasted with the false synagogues described in Rev. 2.9 & 3.9) in hâ-olâm ha-. Those who keep only the Shëva Mitzwot Benei-Noakh receive only the promise of that berit with Noakh – no more Mabul!!!

If I might lend a Middle Eastern flavor to an old maxim: All sheep are animals, but not all animals are sheep. Similarly, all geirim recognize the authority of the Shëva Mitzwot Benei-Noakh, but not all who recognize the authority of the Shëva Mitzwot Benei-Noakh are geirimGeirim are those goyim who have been recognized by a Perushim-heritage Beit-Din as abiding by the Shëva MitzwotBenei-Noakh and commiting to learn and implement the rest of Torâh. Contrary to the poorly translated English, Maimonides like the other Sages, spoke of geirim, never implying that a “gentile” –Benei-Noakh – becomes party to Israel’s share in hâ-olâm ha- by keeping only the Shëva Mitzwot Benei-Noakh. That spin was Church imposition talking. Maimonides14 never even implied that theBenei-Noakh could interpret and judge for themselves whether they were keeping the Shëva Mitzwot Benei-Noakh. That would have subverted the authority of the Beit-Din to decide such interpretations, a contradiction of Torâh.” [Quote: ANBC; available at www.netzarim.co.il ; Israel Mall (left menu)]

Share

25
Jun 11

Torah, Judaism, prosletyzing, Deuteronomy 31:12, gerim, Jews, Louis Feldman, winning converts, Noahides, conversion Judaism

What I plan to post as a blog comment of a blog:

Shalom to you all!

I would like to comment about conversion:

“הקהל (haqeheil; congregate—verb root of Q’hilâh′) ha-am, the men, the women, and the tots; and your geir who is within your gates; so that they will Sh’ma [hearken] and so that they will learn, and they will revere י–ה your Ëlohim′, and will keep shomeir [watchguard] to do all of the matters of this Torâh′.” – Deuteronomy 31:12

(Torah akhat yiheyeh la-ezrakh; w’-la-geir hagar betokh’khem
“One Torâh′ shall be for the citizen [i.e. native Yis'râeili]; and for the resident-alien who resides among you).” S’hemot [Exodus] 12:49

Both geirim – non-Jewish Torah-observant proselytes – and Jews are required according to Torah to keep the mitzwot to the utmost of their ability.

Some persons say that a geir is a ‘convert’. This article proves that the ger tzedeq is not a Jew based on Sh’mot 12:49: Link.

Look up the terms זר (zar) and גוים (goyim) -non-Jewish persons whom don’t keep Torah non-selectively to the utmost of their ability – in a Hebrew concordance to find out that these groups were and are not in a relationsship with the Creator; and that the only thing goyim are promised in Tana”kh is destruction. They are not promised ha-olam haba [the world to come; 'Realm of the Heavens']. These groups are also required to keep Torah according to Tana”kh [the Hebrew Bible] and when keeping the minimum requirements and undertaking to observe Torah non-selectively before a beit din [Judaic court], they get the status of a geir toshav. They are then counted among geirim, whom are required in S’hemot 12:49 and other numerous passages to their utmost to keep the more than 600 mitzvot [commandments] of Torah non-selectively as the Jew does.

Thus if we care for haSheims creations and acknowledge that He loves them and wants a relationsship with them, we must show them why they are required to keep Torah; and this requirement includes becoming a Jew/Jewess as it is explicitly commanded in Shemot 12:48.

There is certainly a precedence in Judaism to win converts:
“The Biblical Archaeology Review declares, “There is simply no one in the world who has a better grasp of Hellenistic Jewish literature than Louis Feldman” (Feldman, Louis H., “The Omnipresence of the G*od-Fearers,” Biblical Archaeology Review, 1986.09-10, p. 45, 58ff). “During the Hellenistic and early Roman period (B.C.E. 323 to 70 C.E.),” Feldman observes, “the Jews were apparently extraordinarily successful in winning converts… A proselytizing movement of such scope, if we may judge from parallel movements in the growth of Christianity and Islam, for example, would seem necessarily to imply the existence of intermediate categories of those at a half-way point or other sympathizers who tried to effect a syncretism of the old religion with the new one…” (loc. cit.).” [Quote]

[More information and further documentation of the above on this blog: Link]

[Regarding Shabbat and writing see this article: Link]

Share

29
May 11

מִשְׁפַּט אֶחָד יִהְיֶה לָכֶם, כַּגֵּר כַּאֶזְרָח יִהְיֶה‮; ‬ ‭ – Va-Yiqra ['Levicitus'] 24.22. ger, zar, avodah zarah

Translation of Va-Yiqra [Levicitus] 24:22 : There shall be one mishpat to you, like geir like citizen shall it be.

Read this article in order to understand the word mishpat: Link

וְהַזָּר הַקָּרֵב יוּמָת (see also bә-Mi•dәbar 1.51; 3.10, 38)

And the stranger who approaches, he shall die.

Word explanation:

יומת (Yumat; he shall die (huphal fu. 3:rd person masc. singular of מות)

“Then there is the זר who claims to keep the Seven Noakhide Laws, knowing neither that the earliest documented treatise on the Seven Noakhide Laws was laid down by the Beit Din ha-Nәtzâr•im (“Noachide Laws,” EncyclopediaJudaica 12.1190) nor that the Seven Noakhide Laws were interpreted by a Beit-Din—which meant that the Noakhide Law requiring promulgation of courts of law implies subjugating oneself to an Orthodox Beit-Din. No זר is keeping the Seven Noakhide Laws unless he or she is doing so under the auspices and guidance of an Orthodox Beit-Din—in which case he or she is a גר (geir), not a זר (zâr)! Those who check the Bible and ancient documentation will discover that the notion that “Bәn•ei-Noakh” have a place in heaven is a modern rabbinic innovation, originally designed to allay persecution from the Church. Tor•âh declares explicitly concerning itself that “You shall neither add to it nor diminish from it” (Dәvâr•im 13.1). Rabbis have no more authority to contradict Tor•âh than anyone else. Those who trust in modern rabbinic innovation place their eternal welfare in the hands of men instead of in the Word of י--ה.

In this week’s pâ•râsh•âhTor•âh declares explicitly, repeatedly and unequivocally, that the זר who approaches shall die. There are Tor•âh solutions, which I will explain to you shortly; but the true solution isn’t predicated on the premise that י--ה lied about this.

If you haven’t been recognized by an Orthodox Beit-Din then Tor•âh defines you as a זר (zâr, male stranger) or זרה (zâr•âh, female stranger)—both included in עבודה זרה (strange service = idolatry).

Tor•âh provides for an Orthodox Beit-Din to recognize a worthy candidate who is a זר (zâr, male stranger) or זרה (zâr•âh, female stranger) and either educate and transform him or her into a Jew(ess) or, if he or she cannot qualify (usually due to a marital situation), upgrade him or her to a גר (geir) or גרה (geir•âh), respectively. Tal•mud confirms that the geir is included within the community—and bәrit—of Yi•sәr•â•eil. By contrast, Tor•âh defines the זר (zâr, male stranger) in A•vod•âh Zâr•âh, not, lә-hav•dilTor•âh. (Further details are found in our Khavruta.)”

[Quote: www.netzarim.co.il]

Share

29
May 11

Noahides conversion, Jewish conversion, Exodus 12:48, Pesach lamb, Mishnah, circumcision, Halachah, mitzvot

“9.14— Here the geir who will live among Jews is instructed to keep Pësakh and that there is one חוק (khoq) for geir and Jew. This passage requires that, unless otherwise specified in Tor•âh shë-bi•khәtâv, the geiris to keep Tor•âh in the same was as the Jew. One prominent passage demonstrating a difference is Shәm•ot 12.48, which encourages the geir to be circumcised if he wishes to keep Pësakh; “for no uncircumcised person shall eat of it.” Since the only significant difference between a Geir tzëdëq and a convert is circumcision, this latter passage demonstrates

  1. Tor•âh‘s preference for complete conversion and
  2. the (uncircumcised) geir is not to eat of the Pësakh lamb.

Non-Jews should realize that circumcision in Tor•âh means ritual circumcision according to Ha•lâkh•âh, that is as recognized by Pәrush•im-heritage Jews. A non-Jew who is only medically circumcised is still uncircumcised according to Mish•nâh.”

[Quote and learn more about how to relate to the Creator by reading the posts in the top menu of this blog.]

Share

29
May 11

Non-Jews, Christians, kosher? Qadosh, Levicitus 11:44, 45; 19:2; 20:7; 21:8; Deuteronomy 7:6, 14:2, 21;

The Tor•âh section discussed how observant Yәhud•im were prohibited from social interaction even in their own community during periods of defilement. This contrasts with the total ban during those centuries against social interaction with goy•im. While geir•im were considered provisionally within their community (and, therefore, the ban never applied togeir•im), Ribi Yәho•shua and his followers were religious Yәhud•im, who observed the total ban against defilement by assimilation through social interaction with goy•im. For religious (as opposed to Hellenist-Reform) Yәhud•im, interaction with goy•im was limited to business transactions and Tor•âh outreach—qi•ruv.

In contrast to Ribi Yәho•shua and his followers, who went to such great lengths to avoid defilement—even within their own community—and observed the total ban against defiling contact with goy•imgoy•im Christians, who have been deceived into “faith” in post-135 C.E. Roman pagans, by choice live a life of deliberate defilement, willfully transgressing theTor•âh precept of Havdâl•âh between Qodësh and khol, defiling themselves in all manner of defilements prohibited by Tor•âh.

Christians believe they are made “holy” even while rejecting the Tor•âh of י--ה to choose, instead, “following their own heart and their own eyes” (bә-Mi•dәbar 15.39) after relativism (comparing themselves to their peers) and hedonism; freely defiling themselves with all manner of defilements. Roman deception has deluded them into believing that their 4th-century C.E. Roman counterfeit, Jesus, “saves” them. Even Paul the Apostate contradicts this, declaring that for anyone to represent that Jesus saves them while they continue to transgress Tor•âh, αμαρτιας (amartias; misses the mark, i.e. “sins”), and would imply that Jesus serves sin, and is, thereby, a servant of sin (Gal. 2.17)—which Christians, daily, demonstrate is true!!!

Historical Ribi Yәho•shua, by contrast, was a very well known Pәrush•im teacher of Tor•âhRibi, hello?—who lived and taught Tor•âh all of his life. Thus, just as Oxford historian James Parkes concluded, post-135 C.E. Jesus is the polar opposite, the arch-antithesis of first-century historical Ribi Yәho•shua. (Further, therefore, since Ribi Yәho•shuais the Mâ•shiakh, his arch-antithesis, Jesus, then has to be the antichrist; and the Christian Church following the antichrist is ‘the Apostasy‘!!!)

The self-contradicting premise that keeping the body immersed in a cesspool produces a “holy” nëphësh is the epitomy of paganism, not to mention incomprehensible blindness and ignorance. No less self-contradicting are the sanctimonious “Bible believers” who reject the only, original, Bible!!! (No Christian theologian can make a case for the NT solely from the Jewish Bible and pre-135 C.E. Judaic literature that Ribi Yәho•shua and his Jewish followers accepted.) Unfortunately, with rare exception, Christians can’t read the first word of the Bible that Ribi Yәho•shua and his Jewish followers knew and accepted. Now that’s a religion of blissful ignorance that has been responsible for the deaths of millions of Jews. (For 2,000 years, Christians have maintained that Jews have been rejected by god, blinded ignorant to “the truth” of Jesus and, consequently, servants of Satan—who, therefore, are enemies of the Church—culminating in the Inquisition and the Holocaust. So, Christians have no right whatsoever to get sanctimoniously self-righteous about, finally, having their error exposed.)

If Christians would only learn to read the Bible (it’s Hebrew) they would know that it states unequivocally that “you shall not make your nëphësh abominable” and “you shall not make your nëphësh tâm•ei with any swarming bug on the earth” (wa-Yi•qәr•â 11. 43). Like any other violation of Tor•âh, eating something not kâ•sheir makes one’s nëphëshabominable and tâm•ei, the polar opposite of holy! Indeed, in no small measure you are what you eat.

The simple truth is that a nëphësh can only be made qâ•dosh in a body that has been made qâ•dosh.

Legitimate Jews do their utmost to keep Tor•âh, which activates י--ה‘s provision for ki•purTor•âh-Jews, therefore, are “saved.” The Christian who promulgates the canard that Jews rely on their works for salvation, or is “lost” as a result, is a misojudaic impugner; and the Hebrew word for impugner is שטן (Sâ•tân). Tor•âh specifies that exercising our free will to do our utmost to keep Tor•âh is the only way to activate His provision for making us qâ•dosh—body and nëphësh. Until we exercise our free will to do our utmost to obeyTor•âh, His provisions aren’t activated—no ki•pur and, therefore, no “salvation.” How shocking it must be for Christians to discover that it is they who have been “Left Behind”!!! If Christians disappear from an airplane in-flight, it is because Ël•oh•im is the Pilot and their tickets to that destination were counterfeit. (Fly Ël Al and learn to pray with the religious Jews on board.)

Jesus of the post-135 C.E. Hellenist Roman pagans loves practicing sinners who please themselves, but י--ה of the only Bible that Ribi Yәho•shua knew loves those who do their utmost to please Him. Since Ribi Yәho•shua knew only that Bible and taught that Bible, like his (and our) Father, Ribi Yәho•shua also loves those who do their utmost to please י--ה, NOT practicing sinners who please themselves!!! Both are immediately recognizable by their conduct (i.e. “works”).

The fact is that all representations that this Tor•âh-teaching Jew excused violations of Tor•âh are based on gentile ignorance of Tor•âh COUPLED WITH the gentiles’ utter dependence upon the post-135 C.E. Hellenist syncretism of Roman gentiles who adopted into their pagan mythology a few messianic concepts from the Jews whom they had just annhilated in two wars and so hated. Historians like Oxford’s James Parkes have well documented that the fourth century C.E. Roman Church was the opposite of Ribi Yәho•shuaand the Nәtzâr•im Jews of the first century C.E. The post-135 C.E. gentiles even conjured up their own rewrite of history. Any good encyclopedia notes that there is absolutely no evidence of any pope before 135 C.E.; certainly not “St. Peter.” (The historical figure, who was one of the first twelve followers of Ribi Yәho•shua, was a Tor•âh-keeping Jew namedShim•onKeiphâ” Bar-Yonâh. It’s absurdly anachronistic to suggest that this first century Tor•âh-keeping Jew embraced Hellenist Roman gentile notions of a papacy that weren’t even concocted until well after 135 C.E. The Pope, in fact, is a counterfeit deriving from the first gentile (Roman) bishop who, according to Eusebius, usurped the rightful authority of the 15th Nәtzâr•im Pâ•qid in 135 C.E. in the wake of the Roman crushing of the Bar-Kokhvâ Rebellion and the exiling of all Jews from Yәrushâlayim—including the Pâ•qidThe rightful authority of the Pâ•qid was never transferred to Roman gentiles or their “pope.” From the original fabrication of papal succession the “pope” has never been anything other than a usurper, a deceiver advocating straying from Tor•âh into A•vod•âh Zâr•âh, and a counterfeit of the Nәtzâr•im Pâ•qid.)

Teimani Seipher Torah
Tei•mân•i
Seiphër
Tor•âh

In addition to relying upon blatant deceptions, Christian beliefs are also based on further misconceptions. The only Bible that Ribi Yәho•shua and his first centuryNәtzâr•im knew is Hebrew. If you’re reading a translation then you’re depending on men instead of the Word of י--ה. Contrary to misojudaic Christian teachings by people who can’t even read the Bible, Tor•âh DOESN’T mean “law.” Tor•âh means “Instruction”—in how to be qâ•dosh; exactly what one needs to do in order to gain entrance into the community that “neighbors” with י--ה Who is qâ•dosh. Any fool can figure out that י--ה Who is qâ•dosh cannot pollute His Holiness by neighboring with a nëphësh that, hypocritically, claims to be “holy” while deliberately keeping itself in an unholy body. Though stating it once would suffice, His mi•tzәw•âh requiring His servants to be qâ•dosh is declared repeatedly (wa-Yi•qәr•â 11.44, 45; 19.2; 20.7; 21.8; Dәvâr•im 7.6; 14.2, 21; 23.15; 26.19; 28.9; 33.3; et al.).

“By their fruits, that is their works, you shall know them.” Others are pretenders, Displacement Theology described in Rev. 2.9 & 3.9—and those who depend upon a false, contra-historical pretend Jesus, in a false, pretend “spiritual Israel” are fated to a false, pretend “salvation.” Shed the ignorance of irrational superstitions and get back in the real world. Get historical, factual, truthful, scientific and logical like the Creator of this universe you’re trying to get to know. [Quote and learn more about how to relate to the Creator here: www.netzarim.co.il]

Share